I'm embarrassed. This bag makes me smile a little. And I'd probably buy it if it were at Forever 21 or Claire's and cost $20 and carry it during the summer when I'm going out for drinks somewhere outside for a bit of irony or was at the beach where no one can see me and small doses of tacky is marvelous. But £1,690? Is Armageddon really coming and it's all Jessica Simpson's world now?

Posted by: Anna | May 11, 2006 7:26 PM

I use to really like LV, but lately they are coming up with some ugly s--t! I think Marc Jacobs is making LV bags ugly on purpose (so his own line of bags sell more). LV is starting to be waaaaay over priced & ugly. If I am going to spend the money I would get a Chloe, YSL..something more tasteful. Too much ($) to look like a logo whore

Posted by: T | May 11, 2006 10:21 PM

I like the little charms attached to the fringe... that is all.

Posted by: Beth | May 12, 2006 2:41 AM

i like the idea of the fringes wth charms attached, but if it were on a plain bag, the lv print and fringes combined makes it look far too busy.

Posted by: tracey | May 12, 2006 1:09 PM

its the stitching on the leather that does it for me. i love lv,i own 4 pieces (all real, hate fakes) the charms r lovely, if u took the fringes n stitching away and just had a charm 4 a zipper pull or something subtle itd look great

Posted by: A | June 25, 2006 4:49 PM

I love this bag and i own one myself. i think paying the £1,690 is worth it some people say its to much but this is one of the best quality i have ever seen its beautiful the fringe, the charms, the beads, the monogram multicolore, the stiching...its tres chic.

Posted by: Megan | September 18, 2006 11:35 PM

I love this bag and my father is getting this for me for my birthday. If you are fashion scared run away but if you are a glam girl rock this bag:)!

Posted by: rachel | October 27, 2006 5:56 PM

Looks like it ate some bags of confetti and now it's regurgitating.

Posted by: katgrrrl | November 7, 2006 4:44 PM